Spending more money for the sake of spending it does not necessarily mean we are achieving our desired results or outcomes.
Glenn Thompson: “Spending more money for the sake of spending it does not necessarily mean we are achieving our desired results or…”
Editor's note · Context
Thompson emphasizes the need for effective spending in government programs.
Share
More from Glenn Thompson
I did not support the amendment that passed out of committee by voice vote banning greyhound racing nationwide. I think a ban is heavyhanded. It sets a dangerous precedent, and it doesn't take into consideration the tracks that are…
Our reconciliation instructions provide the opportunity to restore integrity to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, to make sure that this essential program works for the most vulnerable and functions as Congress…
SNAP reforms would “restore integrity” to the program and ensure it works for the “most vulnerable among us, including children.”
I have concerns about the unintended consequences that may arise should Congress begin to chip away piecemeal like that the ban on hot food in SNAP without considering the broader ramifications, particularly for program integrity. A change…





