What is the consequence to an NIH employee who has this kind of a relationship and does not make the required financial disclosure?
So you are saying there need not be a change in the statute? That was my question.
How do you define those broad responsibilities?
Do you think there would be a significant loss of researchers at NIH if there was a blanket prohibition against consulting fees or owning st...
I think these rules need transparency, need strengthening, et cetera, but I think it would be a mistake for a complete prohibition.
I think the hearing has been very useful in covering the consensus on public disclosure without any complex definitions.
Are you not in a position, knowing that, to impose a sanction if one is appropriate?
Would not at minimum those individuals fit into the category of the kind of responsibilities which would warrant public disclosures?
I think the hearing has been very productive.
It is not easy to run all these hearings without a scorecard, and we do not work on a text.
Well, the agencies do not appear to be moving with much dispatch on it.