I want to make one more point. That is on the issue of the Supreme Court taking more cases. Here again, if there was transparency, America would be outraged at the workload on the Supreme Court, as the Court has moved from one clerk, to two clerks, to three clerks, to four clerks. And I do not begrudge them the time between the session ending in late June and the first Monday in October, where they travel and lecture and write books. But I am much concerned about the circuit splits. For anyone who may be watching on C-SPAN2--and I know my aunt and sister are watching--these cases are very important because if the Third Circuit, having Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware, decides a case one way and the Ninth Circuit, governing the Western States, decides it another way, and the case arises in Wichita, KS, nobody knows which precedent to follow because the circuits are autonomous. There are many important cases which the Supreme Court does not decide when there are circuit splits and they have time to decide them.
On the recordJuly 15, 2010
Editor's note · Context
Senator Specter discusses the Supreme Court's case workload and the implications of circuit splits.
Share
More from Arlen Specter
Nov 29, 2010
One other point briefly--I see a colleague awaiting an opportunity to speak--and that is my hope we will address, before the end of the year, the issue of televising the proceedings of the Supreme Court of the United States. This is an…
Dec 5, 2011
The authority of the Congress under the Commerce Clause was unchallenged for 60 years and then in Lopez and Morrison cut back.
Dec 21, 2010
this is not a farewell address but, rather, a closing argument to a jury of my colleagues and the American people outlining my views on how the Senate and, with it, the Federal Government arrived at its current condition of partisan…





