Bill Clinton's judges are soft on crime. All of our antidrug and anticrime legislation is useless if Clinton's judges refuse to enforce the law. One of Clinton's nominees to the Federal bench--a Democrat fund-raiser from Miami--didn't even know about the Supreme Court's 1995 affirmative action decision. Another Clinton judge dismissed a defendant's confession and 75 pounds of cocaine. Why? The judge ruled that police are corrupt, and that drug dealers should be allowed to run away. Bill Clinton has already appointed 25 percent of all Federal judges. If Clinton is elected again, he will have the chance to appoint up to 50 of all Federal judges, as well as one, two, or three Supreme Court judges. Do the American people want President Clinton to appoint half the Federal judges? I hope not. I, for one, would rather see a Federal judiciary that cares about crime victims.
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing President Clinton's judicial appointments and their impact on crime enforcement.
Share
More from Wes Cooley
yesterday I introduced H.R. 1375, legislation that would stop the U.S. Forest Service from hurting hard-working, law-abiding ranchers that graze their herds on forest system lands. My bill would extend Forest Service grazing permits until…
tonight, time permitting, I will be giving a very important special order on timber salvage, an issue that is vital to my district and the West. I will explain at length the necessity of salvage and the benefits to the environment…
We have both served in legislature and in government prior to coming to Congress, and as State legislators and a State senator, we mandated many things which we were forced to pass on to the small communities which we knew would not be…
Thank you for your comments. I would like to say something other than what I prepared to tell you just about how bad this has become in my State of Oregon. I have a small community on the east side by the name of Haines. It has about 120…





