I include in the Record additional letters in opposition to this resolution. Service Employees International Union, Washington, DC, February 13, 2017. Dear Representative: On behalf of the two million members of the Service Employees International Union (SEID), I urge you to vote against H.J. Res 66 and H.J. Res 67, resolutions disapproving of the Department of Labor's rules relating to retirement savings arrangements established by states and qualified state political subdivisions. The Department of Labor rules make it easier for small employers to offer their workers access to programs for retirement savings and achieve an essential component of the American dream. There is a retirement savings crisis in our country. Fifty- five million workers do not have access to a retirement savings plan at work. As a result, nearly half of all workers have no retirement assets--no pension, no 401(k), and no IRA. States have stepped in to begin to address this crisis with innovative legislation that gives workers the opportunity to set aside their own money in low-fee, professionally managed savings accounts. Importantly, private sector money managers and administrators will be hired to run these programs on behalf of the states, generating American jobs.…
Share & report
More from Suzanne Bonamici
Today, the National Parents Union released a poll that supports an alternative version of H.R. 5 and does not support H.R. 5 in the least. In fact, the majority of people believe that the bill of rights should guarantee that students…
I know that I will continue to draw inspiration from her legacy and her commitment to justice. On behalf of her friends, family, and former constituents, I request that my colleagues on both sides of the aisle support this important bill.
Anyone seeking reproductive care should have access to a real healthcare provider that will provide them with real, comprehensive, and accurate medical information. That is not what they get at pregnancy resource centers. I urge my…
I just want to point out that it is definitely not the first time that the definition of discrimination based on sex included sexual orientation and gender identity, because Trump-appointed Justice Neil Gorsuch did exactly that in the…





