it seems to me that it is very revealing that when my Republican friends feel strongly about the budget, they enshrine their views in the Constitution. But when it comes to protecting senior citizens, for the last half hour we have heard every manner of argument as to why Social Security really does not need constitutional protection. I am of the view that on a bipartisan basis Social Security deserves legally binding, constitutionally protected safety. Unfortunately, this resolution does not do that. Senior citizens deserve better, and on a bipartisan basis we should make sure that it gets done.
On the recordJanuary 25, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for constitutional protection of Social Security during a budget debate.
Share
More from Ron Wyden
Aug 11, 2026
The Republicans’ health care scheme in their so-called “Big, Beautiful Bill” is importing the worst practices of for-profit health insurance programs into Medicare and Medicaid.
Aug 7, 2026
When you lose your home in a wildfire, the last thing you should be worried about is being hit by a massive tax bill.
Aug 8, 2026
At a time when communities are facing health care workforce shortages, it has never been more important to invest in the next generation of health professionals. This legislation would provide families in Oregon and nationwide with the…
Jul 31, 2026
Pete Hegseth has made no secret of his contempt for women and transgender servicemembers.





