I think the remarks my colleague has made are thoughtful. He knows that since my days as director of the Gray Panthers, I have always wanted to work in a bipartisan fashion. But how do you do it if, in fact, in the Finance Committee, we have not had, by my calculus, a healthcare hearing in 400 days? Isn't that what my colleague is saying, is that we ought to have these hearings and we ought to work in a bipartisan way? That is what we did in the PBM bill, where we got a 26- to-nothing vote. I see my friend from California, a new Member. You can't get a vote around here 26-to-nothing to order a can of Sprite but it was because colleagues like Senator Welch wanted to find some common ground and get going. Isn't that what my colleague is saying, is that we want to work with Republicans in a bipartisan way and we are available 24/7 to do it? Is that correct?
On the recordNovember 6, 2025
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for bipartisan healthcare hearings in the Finance Committee.
Share
More from Ron Wyden
Aug 18, 2026
extremely dangerous to give Trump massive new tariff powers, particularly after we've seen the disastrous impacts of his corrupt, chaotic, and inflationary tariff spree,"
Aug 7, 2026
Safe drinking water is not a partisan issue. Families across the country expect that when they turn on the tap, their water is safe to drink.
Jul 31, 2026
Trump’s sweetheart audit immunity deal is perhaps the most brazenly corrupt action taken by a president in American history.
Aug 19, 2026
Our state’s world-renowned wood products industry only gets stronger with federal investments like these that sharpen its cutting edge, keep generating jobs and lessen the dangers from wildfires.





