If the Senator will let me reclaim my time, I will read the precedence we are citing with respect to our opinion that our bill covers economic losses in line with State law and common law. Let me read to the Senator the precedent: The prevailing common law rule is that ``recovery of intangible economic losses is normally determined by contract law.'' That is Prosser, 1984. Accordingly, the courts have essentially allowed plaintiffs to address these matters in State contract law by Clark v. Int'l Harvester Company, Chrysler v. Taylor, Inglis v. American Motor Company. Our position is that the economic loss rule in our bill is merely an explicit recognition of this sensible principle, which is in line with the legal precedence I cited, and also Prosser.
Ron Wyden: “If the Senator will let me reclaim my time, I will read the precedence we are citing with respect to our opinion that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the economic loss rule in relation to state and common law during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Ron Wyden
This throws doubt upon Treasury’s interpretation of many provisions of the Code, creates a great deal of uncertainty in the administration of our tax laws, and could balloon the deficit.
My heart goes out to the innocent victims of today’s horrific shooting at Silver Rail Elementary School and their loved ones now facing the awful consequences of yet another school shooting in America. The best way to honor these victims…
The White House should make MITRE’s findings public as soon as possible.
Flock’s AI surveillance cameras have sparked a nationwide backlash against unnecessary government intrusion into Americans’ lives.





