If the Senator will let me reclaim my time, I will read the precedence we are citing with respect to our opinion that our bill covers economic losses in line with State law and common law. Let me read to the Senator the precedent: The prevailing common law rule is that ``recovery of intangible economic losses is normally determined by contract law.'' That is Prosser, 1984. Accordingly, the courts have essentially allowed plaintiffs to address these matters in State contract law by Clark v. Int'l Harvester Company, Chrysler v. Taylor, Inglis v. American Motor Company. Our position is that the economic loss rule in our bill is merely an explicit recognition of this sensible principle, which is in line with the legal precedence I cited, and also Prosser.
Ron Wyden: “If the Senator will let me reclaim my time, I will read the precedence we are citing with respect to our opinion that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the economic loss rule in relation to state and common law during a legislative debate.
Share
More from Ron Wyden
There are other examples of how Mr. Clayton is willing to say anything in defense of Donald Trump’s corruption and abuses.
These destructive health care choices by Trump and congressional Republicans have added up to hospitals, particularly in rural areas, ending maternity care; primary care doctors shuttering their practices; and 3 million Americans now…
Taxpayers cannot keep writing blank checks for a Department of Defense that repeatedly fails to account for trillions of dollars in assets.
We want to stress that this is not the time for creating new or different criteria for accessing this critical funding to support initial attack.





