we pay for it as essentially outlined in the President's budget. According to OMB and the Treasury Department, we would close the loophole that would save taxpayers approximately $5.7 trillion over 10 years. That is the way we pay for the program. The people who are going to be eligible for the program are going to get the same opportunities as those in the manufacturing sector, the same number of weeks. The Senator from Oklahoma has talked about unemployment compensation. This is about retraining people. This is about health care benefits. If you think we are doing enough today when 5 percent of the people get access to the health care program, then I guess that is a rationale for voting against this amendment. I would hope the bipartisan work that has been done on this legislation by myself, Senator Coleman, Senator Brownback, Senator Snowe, and Senator Baucus would warrant the support of our colleagues.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding and support for a health care program during Senate debate.
Share
More from Ron Wyden
More importantly, independent privacy and security oversight is not an optional expense to be cut when it becomes inconvenient.
There are other examples of how Mr. Clayton is willing to say anything in defense of Donald Trump’s corruption and abuses.
These destructive health care choices by Trump and congressional Republicans have added up to hospitals, particularly in rural areas, ending maternity care; primary care doctors shuttering their practices; and 3 million Americans now…
At a time when communities are facing health care workforce shortages, it has never been more important to invest in the next generation of health professionals. This legislation would provide families in Oregon and nationwide with the…





