I respond briefly to the point the Senator is making. It seems to me the Senator makes an interesting point and certainly raises some interesting legal questions. The scenario just described is what Senator Smith and I seek to prevent by keeping our amendment narrow, to involve government entities. In other words, if you were to broaden the scope of the amendment to all kinds of other parties, it seems to me the case would be more credible that perhaps you could have a scenario where you were driven into bankruptcy. That is why we kept it narrow. We believed keeping it narrow gave people an incentive to negotiate and increase the prospect that we wouldn't have this calamitous situation that the distinguished chairman of the committee is so correct to say would be bad for all.
Share
More from Ron Wyden
And my message will be I’ll never stop battling to pass this bill that will ease their concerns about getting walloped with a tax bill when they may already be dealing with the loss of their homes.
When you lose your home in a wildfire, the last thing you should be worried about is being hit by a massive tax bill.
We urge the State Department to ensure timely processing of F, M, and J student and exchange visitor nonimmigrant visas, consistent with the approach taken by administrations of both parties in the past, and to implement other measures to…
I’m heading home this weekend to meet with Oregonians fearing in real time for their lives and livelihoods because of wildfires threatening communities and spreading smoke statewide.





