Our resolution turns the Notice of Intent to Object calendar into a one-stop shop for recording information about objections made to covered requests. At the same time, some have asked us--what happens if a matter that had been objected to later passes? Shouldn't the clerk just remove the relevant information from the Notice of Intent to Object calendar in that situation? It seems to me that makes sense and such action by the clerk would be keeping with the intent of our resolution.
Ron Wyden: “Our resolution turns the Notice of Intent to Object calendar into a one-stop shop for recording information about…”
Editor's note · Context
Wyden discusses the functionality of the Notice of Intent to Object calendar and its management.
Share
More from Ron Wyden
This is another desperate attempt by a failed president to escape Americans’ revulsion with his failed agenda, amounting to one tank of Trump-inflated gas.
These unsung heroes deserve recognition for their tireless efforts to keep our communities safe and healthy, and I’m honored to be leading this effort in Congress.
The Department’s recent decision in August 2026 to quietly strip explicit prohibitions against political interference from its Scientific Integrity Policy is yet another attempt by the Trump administration to undermine scientific facts and…
The White House should make MITRE’s findings public as soon as possible.





