I note a few of the words in particular. He expressed to Senator Daschle a concern that this legislation would ``have a negative impact on Canadian-U.S. electricity trade.'' I can say in the California debacle last year, but for Canadian power, it would have been far worse than it ended up being. Anything we are doing that could disrupt the trade we have with Canada on energy would be a step back, not a step forward. That is why the Canadian Government has notified the Senate leadership that the amendment offered by the Senator from Wyoming is the right thing to do. The underlying proposal is the wrong thing to do in terms of our relationship with Canada. I urge support for the Thomas amendment. It is the amendment we passed in the Senate in the 106th Congress. We ought to pass it again in the 107th Congress as part of this important energy regulation.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of legislation on Canadian-U.S. electricity trade and urging support for an amendment.
Share
More from Robert Smith
On behalf of thousands of information technology (IT) companies and professionals, I am writing to express my support for the Smith (OR) amendment that would provide a 3-year, 30% bonus depreciation provision. Like other companies in our…
I think we get the appropriate communities together to ask some basic questions--what do you need? And how can we collect it and report it?
the events of the past 11 months have forced every American to become more vigilant against the threats to our nation's security. I want to commend the chairman, Senator Inouye, and the ranking member, Senator Stevens, for bringing to the…
Mr. President, a lot of Members went the route of the managers' amendment because we like to accommodate the requests of our appropriators, and to be accommodating to them we did not bring it up. Frankly, I have just learned a lesson here…





