I continue to share his concern about blatant Federal Advisory Committee Act violations by this administration in the development of their Roadless Initiative. In any case, I don't believe "one-size-fits-all" proposals like the President's Roadless Initiative, hatched in the halls of bureaucracy in Washington, D.C., can be any substitute for sound land management policies developed in collaboration with people at the local level. Oregonians, if given a chance, have proven time and again that they can be better stewards of the land than federal bureaucrats.
Robert Smith: “I continue to share his concern about blatant Federal Advisory Committee Act violations by this administration in the…”
On the recordJuly 12, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the Senate's adoption of the Domenici substitute amendment regarding the President's Roadless Initiative.
Share
More from Robert Smith
Jun 11, 2002
It has the same interest in defending the American people regardless of their minority, their race, religion, their culture, their sexual orientation, their disability, their agenda. It seems to me the government's business is not to pick…
May 21, 2024
Agencies should be forced to consider all costs along with benefits of each rule.
Oct 17, 2002
I am angry to say that we are no closer to having a prescription drug program for our seniors. When the Senate debated the addition of a prescription drug benefit to the Medicare program in July, there was clear agreement that such a…





