I continue to share his concern about blatant Federal Advisory Committee Act violations by this administration in the development of their Roadless Initiative. In any case, I don't believe "one-size-fits-all" proposals like the President's Roadless Initiative, hatched in the halls of bureaucracy in Washington, D.C., can be any substitute for sound land management policies developed in collaboration with people at the local level. Oregonians, if given a chance, have proven time and again that they can be better stewards of the land than federal bureaucrats.
Robert Smith: “I continue to share his concern about blatant Federal Advisory Committee Act violations by this administration in the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Senate's adoption of the Domenici substitute amendment regarding the President's Roadless Initiative.
Share
More from Robert Smith
I have every day put into the Congressional Record the details of a hate crime. These are always violent, they are always sickening, but they also happen to an American citizen. They happen sometimes because the victim is black, gay…
Mr. President, a lot of Members went the route of the managers' amendment because we like to accommodate the requests of our appropriators, and to be accommodating to them we did not bring it up. Frankly, I have just learned a lesson here…
I think we get the appropriate communities together to ask some basic questions--what do you need? And how can we collect it and report it?
I would like to read briefly a couple of paragraphs from his article because I think they encapsulate why it is so important that America not waiver at this critical hour. Writes Mr. Will: Today many people say that the Arabs and their…





