Yes. Because producers would be able to get all their 1999 payments as early as October 1998, this form of implementation would provide the necessary financial assistance and flexibility, I believe, to producers. Recognizing the Department's inability to provide a greater range of options, implementation of Senate 2344 in the manner stated I believe would comply with intent of this legislation.
Robert Smith: “Yes. Because producers would be able to get all their 1999 payments as early as October 1998, this form of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implementation of Senate 2344 and its impact on producers' payments.
Share
More from Robert Smith
I say to the American people, what few may be up this morning watching these proceedings, that this is probably our last best chance to pass prescription drugs in the 107th Congress, and I think it is critical we do so. I am optimistic we…
I also will note that President Bush also spoke in support of a bonus depreciation only a few days ago. I quote from him: But any good stimulus package plan must ask the question ``how do we create more jobs?'' and one way to do that is to…
I rise, though, in opposition to his view, and I support the view of the Senator of Wyoming and his amendment. I happen to be a cosponsor of it. I think for people looking in, the C-SPAN junkies like ourselves, may wonder what all the…
I am pleased to again join my colleague Senator Boxer in introducing important tuberculosis control legislation today on the floor of the Senate. Today we are introducing The International Tuberculosis Control Act--this important…





