Mr. Chairman, I want to correct the Record here again and talk about the facts. The facts are that indeed this is an increase of 36 percent from a $1.35 to $1.84 per animal unit month. Mr. Chairman, do not be fooled by the fact that the gentleman states that we only retrieve half the cost from the grazing fee. That is not true. If you believe the Government is efficient by adding up all the costs and then saying, well, ranchers ought to pay the cost of administering the grazing fee, then I think you are on the wrong track. The facts are that the grazers pay almost the cost but we are also paying the NEPA cost. So I think that is a public policy, not a rancher's issue.
Robert Smith: “Mr. Chairman, I want to correct the Record here again and talk about the facts. The facts are that indeed this is an…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of grazing fee increases during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Robert Smith
Agencies should be forced to consider all costs along with benefits of each rule.
The Gerald B.H. Solomon Freedom Consolidation Act reaffirms the Senate's support for continued enlargement of NATO, without naming any names of who should receive an invitation to join. It also demonstrates that extending security and…
I am angry to say that we are no closer to having a prescription drug program for our seniors. When the Senate debated the addition of a prescription drug benefit to the Medicare program in July, there was clear agreement that such a…
I think we get the appropriate communities together to ask some basic questions--what do you need? And how can we collect it and report it?





