I would be inclined to, given the circumstance you mentioned, probably agree with you in that fact situation. If you had a zealous 90 percent Christian district with proselytizing kids, harassing their 10 percent, the 10 percent Jewish, harassing 10 percent Jewish classmates, my hunch would be the Court might say that you do not have a constitutional right to do that. But I am willing to leave it to the Court to determine the constitutionality. My question is this: Once the Court has determined the constitutionality, the 90 percent cannot harass the 10 percent Jewish fellow classmates, but the 90 percent can pray and the 10-percent can pray, then the school district cannot say to the 90 percent and the 10 percent, ``No you can't.''
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the constitutional rights of students in a religiously diverse school setting.
Share
More from Robert Packwood
It is interesting. The Senator says should we not leave it to the local school board. A long time ago, we said, when it comes to freedom of religion, we are not going to allow the local school board to be the last word. We are not going to…
State and local. We brought them in and, by 1960, most people were covered by Social Security and that included survivors. So if the breadwinner died, the widow and the orphan were taken care of. Therefore, welfare--I am not talking about…
There is a slight difference in the problems. When the Dole bill passes, and I hope it will--I think the amendment of the Democratic majority leader will fail--I hope we go forward with this not in a spirit of, ``Well, the Republicans have…
It was not President Reagan's fault, not really our fault. We were just wrong. The only reason I say that is because now we are not facing the same situation we were facing on projections in 1981. Now we are projecting $200 billion to $400…





