I would be inclined to, given the circumstance you mentioned, probably agree with you in that fact situation. If you had a zealous 90 percent Christian district with proselytizing kids, harassing their 10 percent, the 10 percent Jewish, harassing 10 percent Jewish classmates, my hunch would be the Court might say that you do not have a constitutional right to do that. But I am willing to leave it to the Court to determine the constitutionality. My question is this: Once the Court has determined the constitutionality, the 90 percent cannot harass the 10 percent Jewish fellow classmates, but the 90 percent can pray and the 10-percent can pray, then the school district cannot say to the 90 percent and the 10 percent, ``No you can't.''
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the constitutional rights of students in a religiously diverse school setting.
Share
More from Robert Packwood
The words ``constitutionally permitted'' are not in this amendment. What the Senator is saying is that school districts must allow prayer that is constitutional.
Apparently, the Court has said they cannot totally opt out of the religious situation. That is unconstitutional. They cannot say a child cannot pray. You cannot say you cannot meet after school on an equal basis, a religious or an athletic…
I am delighted to join my good friend, the chairman of the Finance Committee, in supporting all of the measures for all of the reasons he said, but I will touch just a moment on why the public has a sense of uneasiness about Social…
Except it withholds funds. That is rather significant to a local school district. At the moment, I suppose we can pass a sense-of-the-Senate resolution that says to the local school district, ``Do not violate the Constitution. If the…





