Does the chairman intend the term ``significant increase in risk'' as used in the amendments to carry a rigid, mechanic, or statistical meaning?
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the interpretation of terms in proposed amendments during a legislative discussion.
Share
More from Mark Hatfield
I want to just make a few comments regarding the Goals 2000. I want to thank my colleagues on the Labor Committee for accepting my legislation to establish a seventh national education goal encouraging the involvement of parents and…
For the record, I want to make a slight comparison between the State of New Jersey, which he represents so ably, and the State of Oregon. But I do not want to do it State by State--that is, State in comparison to State. I want to compare…
let me give you an illustration. We have, as I say, in Harney County 6 million acres, of which 5 million approximately are in public ownership, Federal ownership. The private land in Harney County is being taxed today at $2.90 an acre on…
we have done so by indicating that States should not approve waivers for local education agencies or schools unless a reform plan is in place and the waiver will assist the LEA or school in reaching its educational goals. Mr. President, my…





