this amendment authorizes the Administrator to set maximum contaminant levels under the Safe Drinking Water Act as levels less stringent than the law currently requires, if the alternative level would not result in a significant increase in risks and if it costs substantially less. But there are limits on the amount of flexibility provided. In the case of cancer-causing substances, the less stringent standard must not result in a significant increase in individual lifetime cancer risk. I would ask the Senator from Montana about the use of the term significant in this context.
Mark Hatfield: “this amendment authorizes the Administrator to set maximum contaminant levels under the Safe Drinking Water Act as…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the Safe Drinking Water Act.
Share
More from Mark Hatfield
in 1988, Congress passed and President Reagan signed in law the CORECT program. This program established a federal interagency board to coordinate renewable energy exports and has been a very successful example of how a very small program…
TSA was, quote, governed by self-direction, end of quote, which, quote, bred misbehavior, quote, and led to toxicity rather than a healthy agency, end of quote.
it is a pleasure today to introduce to my colleagues the Reverend Charles Hart. Reverend Hart understood Christ's words when he told his disciples, ``Where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.'' Charles Hart's treasure has been…
I want to call attention to a matter relating to one of our staff people, Pat McCann, who is the staff director for the majority party. He is a very interesting person who has been on this committee, the transportation subcommittee, for 13…





