This amendment authorizes the Administrator to set maximum contaminant levels under the Safe Drinking Water Act as levels less stringent than the law currently requires, if the alternative level would not result in a significant increase in risks and if it costs substantially less. But there are limits on the amount of flexibility provided. In the case of cancer-causing substances, the less stringent standard must not result in a significant increase in individual lifetime cancer risk. I would ask the Senator from Montana about the use of the term significant in this context.
Mark Hatfield: “This amendment authorizes the Administrator to set maximum contaminant levels under the Safe Drinking Water Act as…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the Safe Drinking Water Act.
Share
More from Mark Hatfield
I can sympathize with the frustration expressed by the junior Senator from Florida on behalf of the Gainesville/Ocala communities and regional airport. If the FAA had recognized a legitimate need which still exists, I certainly think it…
Why can't the administration agree that these settlements are a national obligation now to be funded?
I, again, express my deep appreciation for his collaboration, his cooperation, his spirit of friendship, and the demonstration of that friendship day in and day out in achieving our mutual responsibilities to bring this bill to the floor…
The bus and bus facilities distribution table included in the statement of managers accompanying the conference report--House Report 104-785--directs funds to Hood River, OR, for buses. However, it has lately been brought to my attention…





