Madam President, both of my unanimous consent requests have been rejected, as is the right of any Member. But still, there is a principle here--a principle of executing our responsibilities and a principle of transparency, a principle of understanding whether or not the individual before us is a fit character to serve in the office. So I am going to make a formal motion, which is allowed under the rules, to extend this debate. The rules call for 30 hours of debate but provide a clause that, by a vote, we can extend that debate. I propose we extend that debate for an additional 248 hours. That 248 hours would take us until Monday evening, on the evening we return. So again, no time is lost with the agenda before this body, but we would all have the chance to review those 3,000--or at least the first batch of those emails--to determine if there is information that is related to whether the nominee is fit or unfit to hold this office.
Share & report
More from Jeff Merkley
Mr. President, here is the question: Do we pursue the 20th century energy vision featuring dirty, expensive fossil fuels, or do we pursue the 21st century energy vision featuring inexpensive and clean, renewable energy? Trump's energy…
It's long past time for Congress to reassert its constitutional role and prevent another disastrous conflict.
Mr. President, my colleagues, my good friend from South Carolina compared this bill with balancing the family budget. Well back in my neighborhood, balancing the budget means you only spend what you earn. It doesn't mean borrowing, and it…
Mr. President, since yesterday afternoon, Democrats have held this floor to ring the alarm bells across the United States of America about the nomination of Russell Vought to lead the Office of Management and Budget. Russ Vought may not be…





