my colleagues will remember the phrase ``Senate pay-as-you-go,'' or better known as pay-go. It was initiated by my colleagues across the aisle to say each bill should be paid for, and they created a point of order to that effect. But this bill is not paid for. It spends $115 million. Cost that. And there is no offsetting revenue of any kind. So it violates the Senate pay-go rule. Now, I know all my colleagues like to say they are fiscal conservatives, and they wanted to stand up for this pay-go rule. Well, this is a chance to actually exercise some fiscal restraint. Already, we have the situation where we are talking about making tax cuts permanent that will cost $50 trillion in this coming ``Big, Not So Beautiful Bill''--$50 trillion in new debt compared to current law, incredibly irresponsible. Well, here is a chance to do a small item that is fiscally responsible. Honor your previous commitment to the philosophy of Senate pay-go and vote for this point of order.
On the recordJune 12, 2025
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the Senate pay-as-you-go rule and fiscal responsibility in budget discussions.
Share
More from Jeff Merkley
Aug 5, 2026
The Pentagon routinely fails audits without consequences, enabling fraud, waste, and abuse.
Aug 1, 2026
Now that court documents have confirmed what we knew to be true, we write to demand that you restore previously awarded funding that the Trump Administration has weaponized in an attempt to punish perceived political enemies.
Aug 19, 2026
Pollinators need healthy habitats to survive and benefit Oregon’s farms, forests, and natural landscapes.
Aug 6, 2026
As the United States faces yet another record-breaking fire season this year, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) cannot allow these prediction markets to offer unrestricted betting on wildfires.





