So even though it was passed out of committee by voice vote, and you offer a proposal simply to keep the records intact--which I must say, should never have to be asked anyway--but why would any Member of the Senate object to the principle of protecting the records? I mean, I am confused. Don't all of us believe that when there is evidence related to a crime, it should not be put into a shredder or a wood chipper?
Discussing the importance of protecting records related to criminal evidence.
Share
More from Jeff Merkley
To be clear: Both parties have played a role in creating Senate dysfunction, and both have a responsibility to fix it.
This is unacceptable, and our bill holds the Netanyahu government accountable for its illegal, reckless, and inhumane actions in the West Bank.
You can’t wait for a disaster to happen to start preparing, and this funding finally moving forward will be transformative for disaster resiliency along the North Coast.
Your right to privacy includes the freedom to move around your community without every move being monitored.
Other voices in this conversation
