Because, as my colleague knows, the court is back saying the plan that has been put forward after that has been done on the Northwest Forest Plan is still not in compliance. Because the survey and manage requirements that were shoved in in the dark of night by this administration says the Forest Service has been unable and may indeed be incapable of meeting. We still are not achieving the goals of that plan. My point in this debate right here, right now, is that to use that as an example of success is not fair when it has been a failure. I agree we have got to have the science in place.
Greg Walden: “Because, as my colleague knows, the court is back saying the plan that has been put forward after that has been done on…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the shortcomings of the Northwest Forest Plan and its compliance issues.
Share
More from Greg Walden
I don't believe I have any other speakers on my side of the aisle on this measure. I urge its passage, and I yield back the balance of my time.
I have said before and I will say it again: I don't think there is a more fierce advocate for consumers than the gentlewoman who chairs the subcommittee. She has, once again, brought solid legislation to the floor. We appreciate her and…
I don't have any other speakers on my side. I encourage Members to support this really important legislation, and I yield back the balance of my time.
I want to make sure that it is a responsible way for all parties, which is why a number of us are very concerned about the administration's recent support of the waiver to release and transfer the IP for the vaccine.





