Greg Walden actually said...

"the bill's concurrence requirements would significantly delay or prevent implementation of future individual travel management decisions"

"If that doesn't get your attention--and I had to make calls, and all of that, as well."

"The feeling that folks I represent have, and that I have deeply is you already locked off X percent per forest on wilderness, roadless, whatever."

"Your bill would stop the misguided travel management rule on national forests in the West and would promote local control over future proposals that could restrict forest access."