Political Quotes

Elizabeth Furse: This amendment takes $80.5 million from the timber management line item and the National Forest Service section of the…

On the recordJuly 21, 1998
This amendment takes $80.5 million from the timber management line item and the National Forest Service section of the Interior Appropriations bill and it reallocates that money to watershed improvement and recreational management. Let me also say what it does not do. It does not cut money for road maintenance; it does not eliminate the Federal commercial timber program; it does not affect forest stewardship or personal use sales, and it does not prevent Americans from obtaining fire wood and Christmas trees. How did I arrive at the $80.5 million? That number is derived from adding together the money lost, lost, I repeat, on commercial timber sales in individual forests in all nine Forest Service regions. I added them together and we have a total of $80.5 million. It allocates that money to some things that will really improve our forests. What does it do? It allocates money to restoration, to restoration of watershed. Why do we do that? Because not only are watersheds vital to drinking water supply, they are critical to the survival and restoration of healthy fish populations in the West and in other parts of the country. It puts money to recreation management; $20 million is sent to recreational management, because recreation is going to be more and more the use of our national forests, and we need to get our Forest Service ready and able to deal with that.
Said by
Elizabeth Furse
Oregon

Editor's note · Context

Discussing an amendment to reallocate funds for watershed improvement and recreational management.

Share

More from Elizabeth Furse

Sep 9, 1997

That is why I rise in support of the Castle amendment, which makes sense, and oppose the Istook amendment, which makes absolutely no sense. Why does it make no sense? I believe that the Istook amendment will actually increase teen…

govinfo.gov
Jun 6, 1997

for a number of years now I have been deeply concerned about the militarist government in Burma and by its repression of human and civil rights of the citizens of Burma. In particular, I have protested the many years of house arrests…

govinfo.gov
Dec 17, 1998

this resolution has two parts. Of course we support the troops, of course we do. But the second part of this resolution confirms that we should remove a ruler. I cannot believe it is in our best interests to decide who rules in what…

govinfo.gov
Apr 29, 1998

as cochair and cofounder of the Diabetes Caucus, I rise today to oppose H.R. 3717. I believe this bill has absolutely nothing to do with public health but everything to do with election year politics. Now if we want to reduce drug use, let…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation