furthermore, is it the gentleman's understanding that no provision of this legislation is intended to prohibit Federal funding for health coverage that includes services or items related to physician-assisted suicide, provided the portion of the health coverage providing such services or items are paid for with State funds or other non-Federal funding?
Elizabeth Furse: “furthermore, is it the gentleman's understanding that no provision of this legislation is intended to prohibit Federal…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of legislation on federal funding for health coverage related to physician-assisted suicide.
Share
More from Elizabeth Furse
as part of the agreement on the Purchaser Road Credit that has been struck, I understand that several Members who would otherwise have supported this amendment are been forced to vote against my amendment. And so although 40 editorials…
As we see this movement towards responsible management, it is absolutely necessary that the forest be better managed for wildlife, for recreation, and for public good.
I do not think we should talk so broadly about choice. It is a woman's choice and her family's choice and her physician's choice we are talking about. This has been, in my view, the most antichoice Congress that I have ever had the sadness…
First of all, abortion is legal in this country. That is the first thing. Secondly, how dare Members talk about women making these choices in that derogatory fashion. Have they gone through this decision? I have. I have. How dare they make…





