I voted against this legislation as it does not seem fair to cut off federal funds to institutions that have policies against allowing recruiters on campus from employers that have an open policy of discrimination. We should not be punishing universities that have legitimate policy differences. As long as the military continues its ill-advised policy of prohibiting service by openly gay members (although it's interesting that, in times of war, gays and lesbians are considered valuable to our country and not forced out of the military) we should not force them to break their non-discrimination policies for the military.
Earl Blumenauer: “I voted against this legislation as it does not seem fair to cut off federal funds to institutions that have policies…”
On the recordMarch 30, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing legislation that cuts federal funds to universities with non-discrimination policies regarding military recruiters.
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
Jun 11, 2024
House Democrats have collectively shown an impenetrable commitment to the people of sub-Saharan Africa and Haiti.
Jun 4, 2024
I seek the time in opposition to the amendment, although I am not opposed to it. The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman from Oregon is recognized for 5 minutes. There was no objection.
Jun 4, 2024
I deeply appreciate the leadership of my friend from Florida, and his personal experience adds particular impact to his leadership on this. Another tireless champion for rational cannabis reform is Congresswoman Barbara Lee, with whom I…





