Political Quotes

On the recordJuly 29, 2015
I appreciate the gentleman's courtesy, and I appreciate the way he framed this rule debate. Mr. Speaker, we have sort of a hodgepodge here of items that really deserve careful, sustained attention. There is no reason to lump this together. These are important items. And, sadly, the way it has been structured shuts down debate. There is no room under this rule for the Ex-Im Bank. I appreciate person after person coming to the floor, acknowledging that there is broad bipartisan interest in the reauthorization of the Ex-Im Bank and no rational reason to reject it. It is going to have serious consequences, as my friend from Washington pointed out. But there is another area that we are discussing here today that could also make a huge difference for our economy because we are dodging again our responsibilities to deal with a country that is falling apart as it is falling behind. My friend from Texas was too polite. The reason we don't have a 6- year reauthorization is because the House has not met its responsibility to outline how we pay for it. We are still trying to pay for 2015 infrastructure with 1993 dollars. Now we have got legislation that actually mirrors what Ronald Reagan did in 1982, when he called upon Congress to come back, raise the user fee 125 percent, and be able to put hundreds of thousands of Americans to work, and maintain our roads and bridges and transit. We are not doing that.…
Said by
Earl Blumenauer
Democratic · Oregon
Source
govinfo.gov
Jul 29, 2015

Share

More from Earl Blumenauer

Jun 4, 2024

I deeply appreciate the opportunity to join my friends Representatives Mast, Lee, and Joyce in supporting this amendment. Mr. Mast talked about the necessity of providing our veterans with the best possible treatment. I have heard from…

govinfo.gov
Feb 6, 2024

The second phase is really where the rubber is going to hit the road, though, because it is going to be dealing with those subsidies that are contributing to overcapacity and overfishing very directly.

congress.gov
May 23, 2024

Had I been present for the vote today on Roll Call No. 227, Ogles Amendment No. 1, I would have voted ``no.'' Had I been present for the vote on Roll Call No. 228, Mooney Amendment No. 2, I would have voted ``no.'' Had I been present for…

govinfo.gov
Jun 4, 2024

I seek the time in opposition to the amendment, although I am not opposed to it. The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman from Oregon is recognized for 5 minutes. There was no objection.

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation