Let me say, I appreciate the intent that is offered by the sponsors of this amendment. I was prepared, however, to argue rather strongly in opposition in terms of the reimbursement mechanism that was involved, but I understand that that has been stripped out and it is now just purely a notification. While I am hopeful that, as this works its way through the process, we can deal with making sure that the notification process doesn't get in the way of trying to move this in an orderly fashion, I am not prepared to demand a rollcall or be cranky about it, because I do think you have adjusted your amendment so that it loses its onerous nature in the way that it was originally filed. I appreciate the direction you are going and would look forward to working with the gentlemen to make sure that this furthers the public notification but does not bog down the process unnecessarily. As I say, I appreciate the direction that you are going.
Earl Blumenauer: “Let me say, I appreciate the intent that is offered by the sponsors of this amendment. I was prepared, however, to argue…”
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
Substance, not arbitrary deadlines, should drive the outcomes at the ministerial.
I am listening to my dear friend from Montana and the University of Oregon, and I couldn't disagree more. We have the opportunity to produce clean energy in the United States. The cost today of alternatives with wind and solar is cheaper…
As I prepare to leave office at the end of this Congress, one of my greatest disappointments has been an inability to make progress dealing with our flood insurance system and the dangerous pattern of development and infrastructure. What…
Had I been present for the vote today on Roll Call No. 221, Ordering the Previous Question on H. Res. 1243, I would have voted NAY. Had I been present for the vote on Roll Call No. 222, H. Res. 1243, I would have voted ``no.'' Had I been…





