We did. It passed on the floor to put felony provisions for people who would transport these fighting birds, and also to export fighting dogs. What happened in the agriculture conference committee is that the penalty provisions that would have closed the loophole were gutted. It went back to a misdemeanor, so it would not be enforced, even though identical provisions passed both the House and Senate. Even these watered-down provisions are not going to go into effect for another year. Now I use this just as one example, a little tiny example, that shows where the will of the House and the Senate, identical provisions, and something, frankly, that the American public would have even greater penalty provisions in, it would go farther, they read it in. They cut it back. They gutted it. It is nothing in terms of the damage that would be done as far as the American taxpayer is concerned. The gentleman is absolutely correct, and I appreciate it and was pleased to join with the gentleman on the floor in his efforts to put a cap on those payments here in the House. The gentleman is right, 265 Members voted to instruct, to have the Senate's $275,000 payment limit. Lo and behold, we get a bill back, it is the new $360,000 limit, and all sorts of problems and additional aspects to this that actually make that illusory. We see example after example where this agriculture bill is a missed opportunity.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing issues with the agriculture bill and its penalty provisions during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
This week we are having a public media summit in our Nation's Capital, with representatives from independent television stations from across the country. Thirteen years ago, the prospects were not particularly encouraging. We had just had…
I appreciate the gentleman from Butler's courtesy. It was my pleasure to sit next to Bill Pascrell for 16 years. We came to Congress at the same time. We entered the Ways and Means Committee at the same time, and he was right there every…
Streetcars are still the foundation of cities and suburban areas across the country, establishing a pattern that guided development for over a century. By 1910, you could travel from Boston to Chicago entirely on streetcar lines, just…
These things aren't going to get enacted into law, they are not going to make a difference to the American people. It is a distraction, it is a sideshow.





