I hope that this debate will spark a serious analysis and real action on the problems related to roads in our national forests. For people who care deeply about the environment and look beyond the rhetoric, it is sometimes hard to know the best way to protect that environment. In part, this confusion evidenced this evening shows why we should not attempt to legislate or set policy via the appropriations process. It is the blunt instrument that people have referenced. While the passage of this amendment may in fact slow or stop some roadwork, it will not achieve what some advocates claim. It will not stop logging roads, and it is not clear how much, if any, money this will save.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing environmental policy and roadwork in national forests during a House debate.
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
Had I been present for the vote today on Roll Call No. 227, Ogles Amendment No. 1, I would have voted ``no.'' Had I been present for the vote on Roll Call No. 228, Mooney Amendment No. 2, I would have voted ``no.'' Had I been present for…
The American consumer pays the highest prescription drug prices in the world.
House Democrats have collectively shown an impenetrable commitment to the people of sub-Saharan Africa and Haiti.
Either we continue to pursue things on a bilateral basis or take unilateral action when it comes to trade policies, or we invest in a system with other like-minded allies to address things like China's unfair trade practices.





