I personally am disappointed and saddened with the turn of this debate on a tax cut proposal. In the rush to pass the Republican tax program, we are leaving behind the vast majority of Americans. It shortchanges working families, some of whom will end up paying more to concentrate the relief to the top 1 percent, who have already received the bulk of Congress' generosity over the last 20 years. Instead, we should be concentrating on provisions that would give all working families more equitable treatment. The most burdensome tax for working families is the Social Security payroll tax, which takes a bite out of everyone, but falls most heavily on those who make lower incomes and on small business people. The simple remedy of a credit against the Social Security tax would help those who need it most, still give the richest Americans a reduction, as well as, most important, create jobs, because employing Americans would be more economically advantageous. Another adjustment that would be simple, low cost, and make a huge difference would be exempting the profit from the sale of residential property from capital gains. This is the capital gains cut that would reach most Americans. It would cost the Treasury almost nothing, because most people do not pay that tax now. They simply hold onto their property or roll it over to buy more expensive property. Nobody pays it but the dumb, the distressed, and the divorced.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the Republican tax cut proposal and its impact on working families.
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
I can speak confidently for House Democrats when I say we are firmly committed to reauthorization of AGOA and HOPE before their expiration next year.
I deeply appreciate the leadership of my friend from Florida, and his personal experience adds particular impact to his leadership on this. Another tireless champion for rational cannabis reform is Congresswoman Barbara Lee, with whom I…
Had I been present for the vote today on H.R. 5863, I would have voted ``yea.'' Had I been present for the vote on H.R. 3019, I would have voted ``yea.'' personal explanation
The second phase is really where the rubber is going to hit the road, though, because it is going to be dealing with those subsidies that are contributing to overcapacity and overfishing very directly.





