I think it is interesting to consider what would have happened if such a challenge had been made last year, energy independence, for instance, instead of spending up to $230 billion on national missile defense. We have already put an $8 billion downpayment this year. We are starting work in Alaska which, ironically, is something that is not going to make this country safe from terrorist attacks. If people in North Korea actually have a nuclear device, we are as vulnerable to somebody bringing a motor boat into the Puget Sound, into San Francisco Bay, into New York Harbor. Instead of moving forward with a challenge like the gentleman from Washington (Mr. McDermott) talked about, instead this last year has been characterized by a systematic assault on the environment.
Earl Blumenauer: “I think it is interesting to consider what would have happened if such a challenge had been made last year, energy…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing national security spending and its impact on energy independence and the environment.
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
This is not just about extending his presidency, but protecting democracy. While this is a decision for the president and the first lady, I hope they will come to the conclusion that I and others have: President Biden should not be the…
I seek the time in opposition to the amendment, although I am not opposed to it. The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman from Oregon is recognized for 5 minutes. There was no objection.
I would like to start by commending the Biden-Harris administration for their leadership role in the recent extension of the WTO e-commerce moratorium.
But reauthorizing the programs without improving them is a missed opportunity.





