Today I will vote against H.R. 519. This bill would direct the United Nations to return $180 million of previously allocated credits to the United States. U.S. citizens who work at the U.N. pay taxes on their salaries-- unlike other nations. To offset this difference in pay and put American employees on an equal level with their foreign counterparts, we pay money into the United Nations Tax Equalization Fund. Over the years, the U.S. has overpaid by $180 million in credits. Since the TEF funds are in the form of credits, not cash, they cannot simply be refunded as H.R. 519 proposes. As a result, the State Department--in consultation with both Democratic and Republican members of Congress--has offset future appropriations by shifting the funds towards areas of spending that ought to be a high priority for everyone: American security and peace keeping operations abroad. $100 million will be directed towards enhanced security at the U.N. Headquarters in New York to better protect the men and women who work there. The remaining $80 million will reduce future spending on U.S. peacekeeping dues, a policy supported by the current and previous administrations. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) states that this bill will not save taxpayers one dime. The money has long been allocated for other purposes and should not be taken away. In this protracted recession, Congress should spend its time on legislation creating jobs and strengthening our economy.
Editor's note · Context
Blumenauer discusses his opposition to H.R. 519 regarding U.N. funding and its implications for U.S. taxpayers.
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
I strongly support the WTO but, sadly, the limitations that have been mentioned are ones that challenge that optimism.
I am listening to my dear friend from Montana and the University of Oregon, and I couldn't disagree more. We have the opportunity to produce clean energy in the United States. The cost today of alternatives with wind and solar is cheaper…
We ought to put real resources into renegotiating and rebuilding the MFN multilateral framework, like-minded trading partners that address modern American economic challenges.
Republicans used to believe in market forces. They were part of a bipartisan effort to reduce acid rain, which had a cap, which in the short term increased price, but drove innovation. We solved that problem for a fraction of the…





