this bill brought before us is not the way in which Congress should craft legislation. While I'm supportive of increased criminal penalties for corporate misconduct, which this bill includes, it falls far short in other areas necessary to bring needed changes to the corporate world--lack of whistleblower protection and extending the statute of limitations for investor lawsuits. No time was provided to review and analyze this legislation. It did not go through the committee process where it could be debated and refined in a bipartisan manner and was brought to the floor in a manner that does not allow amendments to be offered. Therefore, I do not support this bill. The only reason to treat Congress and the American public this way is to provide political cover.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a bill related to corporate misconduct and legislative process during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
The second phase is really where the rubber is going to hit the road, though, because it is going to be dealing with those subsidies that are contributing to overcapacity and overfishing very directly.
This week we are having a public media summit in our Nation's Capital, with representatives from independent television stations from across the country. Thirteen years ago, the prospects were not particularly encouraging. We had just had…
Had I been present for the vote today on H.R. 5863, I would have voted ``yea.'' Had I been present for the vote on H.R. 3019, I would have voted ``yea.'' personal explanation
Had I been present for the vote today on Roll Call No. 227, Ogles Amendment No. 1, I would have voted ``no.'' Had I been present for the vote on Roll Call No. 228, Mooney Amendment No. 2, I would have voted ``no.'' Had I been present for…





