Recently research has shown that fish populations are not waiting for climate change to make their habitat impossible for them to live. They're moving. That's right: fish all over the globe are migrating to cooler climates. In a process that's been taking place for decades now, fish are sorting themselves out and leaving areas that no longer sustain their quality of life, their ability to reproduce and to thrive. They've steadily been moving to areas where the effects of climate change are not so pronounced. Isn't it interesting that fish, without fancy scientific instrumentation or computer analysis, have reacted to the facts in the sea and moved where they can function, where they can live and where they can, at least for the time being, escape the impacts of climate change? They're also escaping from people who depend on them in their previous habitat to fish, but that's another story on the consequences of climate change and global warming. Isn't it time that the political process starts responding in ways that even fish can? One would hope. But, instead, today on the floor of the House, we're going to return to debate the Keystone pipeline that would carry oil extracted from Canada's tar sands to the U.S. gulf and short circuit Presidential review.…
Share & report
More from Earl Blumenauer
I include in the Record a statement from the League of Conservation Voters, Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Climate Action Campaign, Environmental Law and Policy Center, Clean Energy for America, Chesapeake Climate Action…
I want to begin to acknowledge the pain that people have experienced in the wake of being stripped of their rights and being thrust into legal limbo. We have already seen the impact this horrific decision has had on increased wait times in…
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding and allowing me to speak on this. I think it is worth the wait to bring these important provisions together to the floor to work on a path forward and maybe a little hint of restoring regular order. It…
I appreciate the gentleman's courtesy and his leadership on this issue. I agree with his comments earlier. The notion that somehow this is a wild, Democratic, socialist spending spree and we need to raise the debt ceiling to deal with it…





