Is it not true that, in both the House and the Senate version of the transportation reauthorization, there are a vast number of specific projects, new starts, that are multiyear in nature and that cannot proceed in the absence of their being reauthorized, and that this extension has no bearing on those longer-term, complex, important projects in the gentleman's State and in mine?
Earl Blumenauer: “Is it not true that, in both the House and the Senate version of the transportation reauthorization, there are a vast…”
On the recordSeptember 30, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning the impact of transportation reauthorization on multiyear projects during a discussion.
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
Jun 25, 2024
I have 190 days left in Congress, so I have been spending time on issues that bring people together rather than divide them.
Jul 9, 2024
This is not just about extending his presidency, but protecting democracy. While this is a decision for the president and the first lady, I hope they will come to the conclusion that I and others have: President Biden should not be the…
Jun 25, 2024
These things aren't going to get enacted into law, they are not going to make a difference to the American people. It is a distraction, it is a sideshow.
Jun 11, 2024
But reauthorizing the programs without improving them is a missed opportunity.





