I appreciate you zeroing in on this, Congressman Inslee, because you, as much as anybody in Congress, have been spending the time looking at the consequences of our current use of energy. I think the evidence is not only in terms of the percentage that you referenced, almost a quarter less over a 40-year period, the evidence would suggest that the trend line for energy costs are likely to be understated. Who would have thought, frankly, 6 months ago that we'd be bumping up against $140 a barrel oil and with the likelihood that it could go to $200 before it gets down below $100? So the costs are magnified over time. And given the fact that these planes have actually stayed in service far beyond their design life, that that is further--what if these are going to be operational for another 50 years? I think that projection just pales; it makes it all the more important that we do that. I appreciate your focus. And I appreciate having a chance to join you in this discussion.
On the recordJune 19, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of energy costs and usage during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Earl Blumenauer
Feb 28, 2024
This week we are having a public media summit in our Nation's Capital, with representatives from independent television stations from across the country. Thirteen years ago, the prospects were not particularly encouraging. We had just had…
Jul 9, 2024
This is not just about extending his presidency, but protecting democracy. While this is a decision for the president and the first lady, I hope they will come to the conclusion that I and others have: President Biden should not be the…
Apr 10, 2024
We have $163 billion a year that is not paid by the top 1 percent of American taxpayers.





