I think anybody who has a significant mental health problem is going to have poor reliability.

That 31 out of 31 people sent to you would have exactly the same on 75 different parameters?

Did Mr. Conn ever make any statement to you about why he was destroying all of his documents?

It is true you do work for the Social Security Administration as well.

Is this document typical of the medical forms you completed for Mr. Conn's clients.

So how is it that you also found that this claimant with an IQ of 61, two standard deviations below low normal, had no problem managing his money?

So all this occurred after the Inspector General's visit?

Do you think it is appropriate as a medical professional to copy a claimant's subjective allegations word for word and pass it off as your own medical conclusions?

You would agree with that?

SSA rules prohibit claimant lawyers from charging their clients for doctor visits when additional evidence is requested.

To my knowledge, was Judge Daugherty ever disciplined for what he did?