by reducing strategic nuclear weapons, you exacerbate the disparity between Russia and the United States in tactical nuclear weapons.
The New START treaty is needed in order to provide a critical framework for the strategic relationship between the United States and Russia.
Is the U.S. force capable of carrying out our deterrence and extended deterrence missions now and in the future?
perhaps it was a strategic error to focus too narrowly on strategic arms and ignore Russia's superiority in tactical nuclear weapons.
Secretary Gottemoeller and Dr. Warner, do you believe that the Russians view the deployment of 10 GBIs in Poland as a threat?
Secretary Gottemoeller and Dr. Warner, why do New START procedures regarding the elimination of delivery vehicles not require inspectors pre...
Why does this treaty not address tactical nuclear weapons, even though tactical nuclear weapons remain one of the most significant threats t...
what are the impacts of unilaterally reducing the nuclear payload on each Minuteman III ICBM from three warheads down to a single warhead?
I want to underscore that the focus of these negotiations from beginning to end was strategic offensive arms.
Being outnumbered or outflanked by 10 to 1--it is very disturbing to me.
I have been concerned about the process, and I am not blaming anyone.