It is my intention now--I made my presentation earlier on and a similar presentation yesterday and the Senator from Massachusetts responded. I wish to respond to his responses to clarify some of the things that might be a little unclear. First of all, the Senator from Massachusetts said every Senator on our side and, most importantly, the unbelievably experienced negotiators who put this treaty together, have made a lifetime of trying to understand these kinds of relationships and the ways in which you adequately verify, and they wanted to expand, which I appreciated, how qualified these people were, but here is the problem we have and I think it was articulated by the Senator from South Dakota. We have a constitutional responsibility. We take an oath of office to support the Constitution, and one of the things it is up to us--not to anybody but us--to provide for common defense. Article II, section 2 of the Constitution specifically gives us not just the right but the obligation for advice and consent, and quite often we talk about all these smart people who have agreed with this. That leaves one group out. That is us. We happen to be the ones who are accountable to the people through our election.…
Share & report
More from Jim Inhofe
Let me thank my partner there for all the hard work that we have done together. Not many people understand the process that we go through every year. It is an exhaustive process to get just to where we are today. First of all, I would say…
Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that I be recognized as if in morning business for such time as I shall consume. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to speak as if in morning business for such time as I shall consume. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
While Senator Duckworth's bill is a good faith effort to help her State, I am concerned that basically it kind of pays the communities to tolerate long-term problems.





