On the recordMarch 17, 2015
Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume to close. Mr. Chairman, we have listened to several points of view on different perspectives today. I think the majority floor leader and the chairman of the committee and a number of my colleagues did an outstanding job of explaining why this bill is necessary, why it is appropriate. I will acknowledge to my colleague from Oregon that this is a work in progress, that clearly there are still things that need to be examined, addressed, looked at, and perfected over the course of the legislative session before, ultimately, this is signed into law. But the underlying principles, an entity like the Environmental Protection Agency, which has such tremendous influence and control over our everyday lives--whether you are a farmer, rancher, business person, just a citizen, such tremendous control through their authority and their rulemaking process over our lives--it is important, and it is the very reason that Congress established the Scientific Advisory Board in 1978, it is important to have a knowledgeable group look over their shoulder to verify their facts, to understand the process they are going through in order that, ultimately, that rulemaking process is something that is based on sound science and is something that is appropriate. Now, in the bill we simply say that, in effect, anyone with knowledge and expertise should be able to participate. We ask for full disclosure.…





