The findings of fact by the board show ample reason for the revision downward of Schedule K, in accord with the protective principle, and present the data as to relative costs and prices from which may be determined what rates will fairly equalize the difference in production costs.
Taft argues for a downward revision of tariff rates based on the findings of the Tariff Board regarding production costs.
Share
More from Bill Taft
Another clause that calls for comment is in the leather paragraph, which reads as follows: \Leather cut into shoe uppers or vamps or other forms suitable for conversion into manufactured articles.\
The empirical and haphazard character of this bill is shown more clearly perhaps in the amendment to Schedule A than in any other.
I can not make myself a party to dealing with the industries of the country in this way.
There may be a change of persons, but the government of the United States is in the people of the United States and there are a good many of the people of the United States in Chicago.
Other voices in this conversation
