We don't want to ban that just to establish it. We want to ban the development of it. Another fallacy that they point out though is that this would turn off research. No, by all means, study it, find all the problems with it, and make sure that the people know: Don't go down this path. That is the point of this bill. If Congress uses Article I authority to subsequently set the parameters, as is our constitutional obligation, we could do that with a subsequent bill. The reality is, the Federal Reserve is not responding to dialogue. They need to respond to a law.
Share
More from Warren Davidson
I rise today to urge you and all of our colleagues to support amendment No. 57 to the FY 2026 Department of Defense appropriations bill. This amendment strikes section 8072, a misguided rider that prohibits the Navy from decommissioning…
At this moment, Mrs. Paulette Harlow, a 75-year-old Catholic grandmother, is locked in a Federal prison cell. Why? For peacefully and prayerfully blocking access to a third- trimester, late-term abortion mill. Mrs. Harlow is one of many…
I thank the chairman for yielding time. Mr. Speaker, this accounting bulletin has proven to be a barrier to publicly traded banks having an ability to meaningfully engage in distributed ledger products due to their overly broad definition…
I will close by saying I think the case is clear. I appreciate Mr. Nadler for working with me. I thank Senator Wyden and Senator Lee for being champions of this on the Senate side. I thank the unusual cohort of colleagues here. We have Zoe…





