As we look at this, we have the Federal Election Commission. We have bodies of law that require disclosure, and we have organizations that sometimes violate those disclosure laws, and those companies are prosecuted when they do that. Here, we want to take and add the IRS responsibility of shaping that disclosure, and only for these types of groups and these types of donations. It is intended to have a chilling effect on the speech, and that is at the core of the objection for groups that don't agree on much. Between the ACLU and the NRA they don't often agree, but they agree that H.R. 1 is bad, and this goes to the heart of their objection. Madam Chair, I ask unanimous support for my amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
On the recordMarch 7, 2019
Share
More from Warren Davidson
May 21, 2025
While I love many things in the bill, promising someone else will cut spending in the future does not cut spending. Deficits do matter and this bill grows them now. The only Congress we can control is the one we’re in. Consequently, I…
May 23, 2024
We don't want to ban that just to establish it. We want to ban the development of it. Another fallacy that they point out though is that this would turn off research. No, by all means, study it, find all the problems with it, and make sure…
Mar 13, 2024
This is meant to be able to take out anything, including email where its one user sees it. So it could target an infinite number of companies, but not an infinite number of places. So, for that, I do applaud the work that was done to back…





