This is meant to be able to take out anything, including email where its one user sees it. So it could target an infinite number of companies, but not an infinite number of places. So, for that, I do applaud the work that was done to back off from the dystopian RESTRICT Act, but this is essentially a downpayment on the RESTRICT Act. I encourage everyone to look up the RESTRICT Act. This is what the administration really wanted to do. What Members of Congress on both sides of the aisle wanted to do is to create a bigger surveillance state, and that is what the Intel Committee wants to do with FISA, is to make it bigger. We have to shrink it and protect our Fourth Amendment right to privacy.
On the recordMarch 13, 2024
Share
More from Warren Davidson
Apr 17, 2024
I will close by saying I think the case is clear. I appreciate Mr. Nadler for working with me. I thank Senator Wyden and Senator Lee for being champions of this on the Senate side. I thank the unusual cohort of colleagues here. We have Zoe…
Mar 13, 2024
I thank the gentleman for yielding time. Mr. Speaker, I think it is important we solve the right problem. The gentleman from New Jersey, who isn't actually opposed to the bill, seems to have identified the real issue, which is data…
May 21, 2025
While I love many things in the bill, promising someone else will cut spending in the future does not cut spending. Deficits do matter and this bill grows them now. The only Congress we can control is the one we’re in. Consequently, I…





