It seems to me that they raised the concern that what was being shared with the public is what's different than what was in the final rule.
Editor's note · Context
Davidson highlights discrepancies between public information and final rule details.
Share
More from Warren Davidson
The purpose of this amendment is a technical correction. Often this is done simply in the Rules Committee. For some reason, they chose not to do it. The bill itself states that existing Federal laws are the exclusive means by which the…
for decades, Washington, D.C., has allowed international trade organizations to put our competitors ahead of the American people. Groups like the World Trade Organization allow China to exploit trade loopholes while claiming to be a…
While President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional.
I applaud Congressman Emmer's hard work on getting this important piece of legislation to where it is today. I am encouraged that so many of my colleagues like Mr. Hill, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Huizenga, Mr. Barr, Mrs. Wagner, and subcommittee…





