Political Quotes

On the recordDecember 19, 2017
I am so pleased to join Mr. Luetkemeyer in supporting his bill. I am so encouraged that this is a bipartisan bill. Listening to the Members opposed, I am concerned that the bill is being highly mischaracterized. It occurred to me that when the Member opposed mentioned that 97 percent of banks would not be affected by this, that it automatically excludes 97 percent of banks from being affected by this. Mr. Luetkemeyer doesn't pick a number and say big is bad. He says: Let's judge the bank by its behavior, not by the size of its balance sheet. This is a rational, measured approach, and that is why it has drawn bipartisan support. It is focused on solving the problem, not driving regulatory burdens. Let me explain that the SIFI designation is an arbitrary number, and it subjects banks with $50 billion or more in assets to the same standards as trillion-dollar globally important financial banks. So a bank with $51 billion would be regulated the same way as JPMorgan Chase, for example. Even former Chair Barney Frank, as has been mentioned, seized the problem. Janet Yellen seized the problem. People look at it and say: What can be a solution? The Federal Reserve has seen a possible solution as judging the character of the business activity. Mr. Luetkemeyer's bill firmly addresses that. A simple asset threshold captures numerous banks that are widely perceived to be no threat to financial stability. It also distorts growth decisions.
Said by
Warren Davidson
Republican · Ohio

Share & report

More from Warren Davidson

Jul 13, 2023

The amendment I have introduced, amendment No. 40, simply requires that the Department of Defense study and report the health conditions arising in members of the Armed Forces after administration of the COVID-19 vaccine. We have important…

govinfo.gov
Nov 7, 2023

The amendment doesn't stop people who have genuine needs as defined by our current needs-based program from receiving assistance. It maintains the same level of compassion it has for all Americans. It doesn't treat them with any special…

govinfo.gov
Jul 14, 2023

The amendment I have offered would prevent the Department of Defense from purchasing data that would otherwise require a warrant, court order, or subpoena. The amendment would also end unauthorized surveillance practices. The government is…

govinfo.gov
Mar 13, 2024

This is meant to be able to take out anything, including email where its one user sees it. So it could target an infinite number of companies, but not an infinite number of places. So, for that, I do applaud the work that was done to back…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation