every now and then, I like to thumb through my copy of ``Putting People First'' then-candidate Bill Clinton's book of promises to the American people. And I couldn't help but notice when I last picked it up that the centerpiece of the Clinton campaign was a middle-class tax cut. Let me read a little bit from the section entitled ``Rewarding Work and Families'' middle-class taxpayers will have a choice between a children's tax credit or a significant reduction in their income tax rate.'' That was candidate Clinton speaking. Well, candidate Clinton became President Clinton and that one-time champion of the middle-class soon began singing an altogether different tune. This Congress passed a middle-class tax cut; 89 percent of that tax cut would go to families earning under $75,000 per year. President Clinton said no and vetoed it. He called it a tax cut for the rich. Mr. Speaker, as President Clinton gears up to become candidate Clinton again, I think the American people might want to join me in asking him. ``Mr. President, whatever happened to that middle-class tax cut?''
Editor's note · Context
Discussing President Clinton's veto of a middle-class tax cut during a speech on the House floor.
Share
More from Steve Chabot
I had the honor to serve 26 years here in the House with Don Young. There is an expression some of our Texans have about not messing with Texas. Well, with Don Young, you knew not to mess with Alaska. We butted heads on that several times…
America's small business community is near and dear to my heart, and one of the closest partners that I have had in our congressional district has been the Warren County Small Business Development Center. Having served on the House…
The truth is the legal doctrine in question, substantive due process, is a much more checkered and murky past that abortion advocates would have you believe.





