I will be brief, and then I will invite my colleague from Virginia to respond. Just a couple of quick points. First of all, relative to this significant economic impact language that my distinguished colleague from Georgia is talking about, that is already in the existing law, so we are not changing anything there. We are not saying it ought to say a significant economic impact. It already says that in the existing law. Both the bureaucrats and the courts are used to determining what the terminology like ``significant'' means under the rule or regulation or the law, just as what a reasonable man is. ``Reasonable'' is quite common throughout the legal structure. We are also not giving discretion to Ms. McMahon, the soon-to-be head of the SBA. It is to the Chief Counsel, and he is independent. I yield to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Goodlatte), our chairman.
Share
More from Steve Chabot
The situation at our southern border is an unmitigated disaster and I fear it is about to get a whole lot worse.
I have no further speakers and would be willing to close at this time unless the gentleman has additional speakers. I reserve the balance of my time.
I thank the gentlewoman from Florida (Mrs. Cammack), for her leadership in putting together this Special Order this evening to honor our local law enforcement officers. I can think of few people more deserving of this honor than the men…
Greater Cincinnati is in the grips of Bengals fever. From pep rallies at Paul Brown Stadium, to celebrations at bars and restaurants, and at home, to wall-to-wall coverage on the nightly news, everyone is celebrating the Bengals' third…





