I think the purpose--those that are voting no are not opposed to any of these particular groups having access, equal access to the contracts that are available, but we think it ought to be an equal opportunity and we ought not to pick winners and losers.
Editor's note · Context
Chabot explains the rationale for voting against the amendment, emphasizing equal opportunity.
Share
More from Steve Chabot
We've seen in Ukraine how critical it is that we get the weapons to who has threatened Ukraine--in the case of Russia and Taiwan, in the case of the PRC--ahead of time.
What the question in Dobbs really boils down to is whether you think abortion is better addressed by the people's elected representatives and State legislatures or by nine unelected, unaccountable judges who serve on the Court for life.
As the Ranking Member of the Asia-Pacific Subcommittee, I rise today in support of H.R. 5497, the BURMA Act, bipartisan legislation Chairman Meeks and I introduced last year in response to the coup in Burma. And I want to thank Ranking…





